Contradictory aspects of natural in cosmetics [1st free live webinar]

The concept of natural can be understood in very different ways and has no generally accepted (legal) definition. Natural cosmetics represent an alternative to conventional cosmetic products, in which completely synthetic ingredients typically prevail. Ingredients of natural origin have proven physiological and cosmetic effects. However, generalizing the concept that natural ingredients are better for the skin simply because they come from nature has no scientific rationale.

Progress in natural cosmetics is moving in the direction of scientific approaches. Cosmetically active ingredients of natural origin have become the cornerstone of evidence-based formulating in terms of cosmetic effects and successful marketing. However, many aspects of quality must be considered to achieve high-performing cosmetics.

For that reason the Modern CosmEthics Team organized 1st live webinar in which it was presented:

  • Different criteria for defining natural cosmetics
  • Basic physiology of the skin
  • Examples of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ natural ingredients from our skin’s point of view
  • Examples of appropriately and poorly used cosmetically active ingredients in formulations

Modern CosmEthics is an association that builds and promotes the culture of natural, ethical and cosmetically active products through the CosmEthically ACTIVE certificate. The association also provides evidence-based information and educates users about cosmetic ingredients of natural origin through the Modern Cosmetics book.

Webinar presentation with Q&A: link

Webinar video: 


The lecture was given by Katja Schoss, Master’s degree in Industrial Pharmacy, Bachelor’s degree in Cosmetic Sciences.

Katja Schoss

Deep dive into the topic:

Natural cosmetics are no longer a niche industry. They have evolved to stand proudly as a synonym for the highest level of environmental friendliness. However, natural cosmetics are not yet officially regulated, and there are no unified criteria or recommendations that products must meet to be labelled as natural. That is why a wave of different views on naturalness has washed over the users and manufacturers of natural cosmetics in recent years.

The concept of natural can be understood in very different ways and has no generally accepted (legal) definition. Simply put, natural cosmetics represent an alternative to conventional cosmetic products, in which completely synthetic ingredients typically prevail. Ingredients of natural origin have proven physiological and cosmetic effects. However, generalising the concept that natural ingredients are better for the skin simply because they come from nature has no scientific rationale.

One of the most common examples of such misconceptions is soda or, in chemical terms, sodium hydrogen carbonate. It is a cosmetic ingredient widely used in (natural) cosmetics to achieve deodorant action, as well as for skin and hear cleansing, for the care of acne skin, etc. Soda is indeed a naturally occurring substance, however, it creates an unnatural, even damaging environment when applied on the skin or hair, i.e. a pH value of about 8 to 9, while the physiological pH of the skin is from 4.7 to 5.5. A soda-based deodorant applied on a sensitive skin may cause a burning sensation, pain and redness, and such use cannot be considered natural, skin friendly.

Progress in natural cosmetics is moving in the direction of scientific approaches and evidence-based products known as so-called active cosmetics. Active cosmetic products have an added value: they target the specific needs or conditions of the skin and therefore place priority on individuals’ needs and preferences. That level of advancement in knowledge, technological innovations and new or improved cosmetic ingredients has led to a shift from conventional to high-performance cosmetic activity.

Cosmetically active ingredients of natural origin have undoubtedly become the cornerstone of science-based formulating in terms of cosmetic effects and marketing. For example, glycerol is one of the most effective moisturisers, vitamin E acts as an antioxidant, vegetable oils as emollients, etc. However, many aspects of quality must be considered to achieve high-performing cosmetics, including incorporation of quality raw materials at active concentrations. Without a suitable, i.e. sufficient concentration no significant cosmetic effects can be expected. For example, high molecular weight hyaluronic acid is an excellent moisturising ingredient at about 0.1 to 0.5%. However, if we add it significantly less (which is an example of empty advertising claims) we cannot claim that hyaluronic acid in our product expresses excellent hydrating activity. On the other hand, formulating active cosmetics should not mean putting more and more into the bottle to satisfy the almost endless and insatiable desire for eternal youth. In contrast, excessive ingredients should be considered a burden to the skin or hair (and the environment). Even antioxidants with proven effects can turn into pro-oxidants when their concentration is increased. Indeed, rational formulating with ingredients of natural origin, following the less is more principle, is a challenging task and requires a great deal of research and experience. Constantly gaining knowledge and building an objective and critical approach is therefore of the greatest importance.

14 Replies on Contradictory aspects of natural in cosmetics [1st free live webinar]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.